Bowdoin v. Showell Growers, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WISDOM, Senior Circuit Judge:
This appeal raises a single question: whether the defendants effectively disclaimed the implied warranties of fitness and merchantability with respect to a high pressure spray rig that caused injuries to the plaintiffs. The district court concluded that a disclaimer found in the instruction manual that accompanied the spray rig when it was delivered to the purchaser was conspicuous and therefore effective. We disagree. Even assuming that the disclaimer was otherwise conspicuous, it was delivered to the purchaser after the sale. Such a post-sale disclaimer is not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Zabriskie Chevrolet, Inc. v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Tiger Motor Co. v. McMurtrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Flory v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Rehurek v. Chrysler Credit CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Geo. C. Christopher & Son, Inc. v. Kansas Paint & Color Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. v. Wyse Technology and the Software Link, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- ITT Corp. v. LTX Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Hornberger v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Olathe Manufacturing, Inc. v. Browning ManufacturingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.