Legal Opinion

Bouldin v. Turek

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1979No. 13991-PR-2PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Justice:

The issue before this Court is whether A.R.S. § 12-341.01, providing for an award of attorney’s fees to the successful party in a suit arising out of a contract, applies to suits commenced before the effective date of the statute but decided after the effective date. The two divisions of the Court of Appeals are in conflict on this issue, and we granted a petition for review pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24, to resolve the conflict.

On January 15, 1976, Bouldin, the plaintiff, filed suit against Turek and Jones, defendants, to set aside a completed forfeiture by defendants of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allen v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Gressley v. Patterson Tillage & Leveling Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. USLIFE Title Co. v. Soule Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  4. Stephens v. Greater Arizona RanchesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Flory v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Pilcher v. State, Department of Social ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 1983

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API