Conway v. Supreme Council C.K. of A.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. Black & Learning, for Thomas J. Conway, Appellant. William Caldwell, for Supreme Council, Catholic Knights of America, Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action to enforce the payment by defendant the Supreme Council, Catholic Knights of America, a corporation, of a benefit certificate calling for two thousand dollars, issued to John M. Conway, naming his nephew, plaintiff, as beneficiary. At the first trial the defendants Noonan, Shea, and Menihan had judgment, and on the appeal of plaintiff and defendant corporation the judgment was reversed, for the reason that there was no finding on the plea of the statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 339, subd. 1) interposed by both appellants. (Conway v. Supreme Council etc., 131…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McMenomy v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Weinberger v. WeidmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Conway v. Supreme Council Catholic Knights of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Muller v. RowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by13 opinions
- Easton v. AshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Floyd v. Colonial Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Robinson v. El Centro Grain Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Schlitz v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Estate of DavidsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.