Legal Opinion

Holderman v. Columbus Skyline Securities, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1996No. 94-1445PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

This case presents the court with the issue of whether R.C. 1707.01(J) gives intrastate securities dealers adequate notice that fedéral case law may be applied to calculate the current market price of over-the-counter stock to determine if the conduct of a dealer is fraudulent. For the following reasons, we answer that question in the affirmative.

R.C. 1707.44(G), at the time relevant herein, provided that “[n]o person in selling securities shall knowingly engage in any act or practice which is, in sections 1707.01 to 1707.45 of the Revised Code, declared illegal, defined as fraudulent, or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. CollierOhio Supreme Court · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund v. Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Federated Management Co. v. Coopers & LybrandOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. In Re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
  4. Pharos Capital Partners, L.P. v. Deloitte & Touche, L.L.P.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  5. In Re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc., Investment LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API