Legal Opinion

Swanson v. City of Orange

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 1929No. Docket No. 6179PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, J., pro tem.

Proceedings under the Annexation Act of 1913 (Stats. 1913, p. 587) and amendments thereto for the annexation of certain territory to the City of Orange, a city of the sixth class in the county of Orange, were had up to the point where the city council of said city had passed a resolution calling an election in the territory proposed to be annexed. A petition was filed in the superior court and upon it (the petition is not before us) a writ of review of the above referred to proceedings was issued, without notice to the defendants or either of them. The writ contained the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Imperial Water Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Garvin v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. Town of OntarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Stumpf v. Board of Supervisors of San Luis Obispo CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Strong v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. City of Morgan Hill v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API