Legal Opinion

Hurt v. Dow Chemical Co.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided September 28, 1990No. 90-0783-C(3)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

759 F.Supp. 556 (1990)

Irene HURT, et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

No. 90-0783-C(3).

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.

September 28, 1990.

Mary Coffey, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs.

Frank N. Gundlach, Mary C. Kickham, Armstrong Teasdale Schlafly Davis & Dicus, St. Louis, Mo., for Dow Chemical Co.

Margaret E. Gangle, Geissal & Gangle, John D. Warner, Jr., Kortenhof & Ely, St. Louis, Mo., for Rose Exterminators.

ORDER

HUNGATE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant Dow Chemical Company's ("Dow Chemical") motion to dismiss for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. International Paper Co. v. OuelletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Free v. BlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Burke v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
  2. Romah v. Hygienic Sanitation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Montana Pole & Treating Plant v. IF Laucks and Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1991
  4. Davidson v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Reutzel v. Spartan Chemical Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API