Legal Opinion

People v. Miranda-Olivas

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 29, 2001No. 01SA227PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

In this interlocutory appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1, the People seek reversal of the trial court's suppression of statements made by Defendant to police on April 9, 2001. The trial court ruled that a police officer's statement to Defendant that he did not want to see Defendant's girlfriend "get drug into this thing if not actively involved" was "tantamount to a valid threat to arrest a woman who he had no reason to believe was involved," rendering Defendant's statements involuntary as the product of coercive conduct.

The record does not support the trial court's finding that Defendant's…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. LozaOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. RaymondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Effland v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  2. People v. Al-YousifColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. People v. HumphreySupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  4. People v. Preciado-FloresColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. In re C.L.S.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API