Legal Opinion

Mary Fox v. Elk Run Coal Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 3, 2014No. 12-2387, 12-2402PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judge FLOYD joined.

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Mary Fox contends that Elk Run Coal Company committed fraud on the court and thereby deprived her husband, coal miner Gary Fox, of nearly a decade of benefits under the Black Lung Benefits Act (“BLBA”). The Benefits Review Board (“BRB”) found that Elk Run’s conduct was not sufficiently egregious to meet the high bar for a claim of fraud on the court because it did not amount to an intentional design aimed at undermining the integrity of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Faisal Nabin Kashem v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Roderick WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  4. United States v. HiggsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
  5. United States v. Sierra Pacific IndustriesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API