United States v. Sierra Pacific Industries
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
*953 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
After reaching a settlement with the government and requesting the court to enter judgment pursuant to that settlement almost two years ago, defendants Sierra Pacific Industries, Howell’s Forest Harvesting Company, and fifteen individuals and/or trusts who own land in the Sierra Nevada mountains (referred to collectively as “defendants”) now move to set aside that judgment based upon “fraud on the court.”
I. Brief Factual and Procedural Background
On September 3, 2007, a fire ignited on private property near the Plumas National Forest. The…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re G.L., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- Fly v. DiazDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Foor v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- United States v. Polaris Industries, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2020
- United States v. THE DORCHESTER OWNERS ASSOCIATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023