United States v. Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
We are asked to decide whether certain allegations of fraud, some of which were known before the parties settled and some of which came to light after settlement, rise to the level of fraud on the court such that relief from the settlement agreement is warranted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(3). Because the instances of alleged fraud known before settlement cannot justify relief, and the instances discovered after settlement do not rise to the level of fraud on the court under Rule 60(d)(3), we affirm.
I
This case arises from a forest fire that broke out…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Padgett v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Trendsettah USA, Inc. v. Swisher International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Innova Solutions, Inc. v. Kathy BaranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- In Re G.L., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- OPC v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 2022
- (HC) Bouie v. Board of Parole HearingsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.