Legal Opinion
State v. Solomon
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 4, 2007No. AC 27716PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The defendant, Daniel Solomon, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of assault in the third degree, unlawful restraint in the second degree and interfering with an emergency call in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-61 (a) (1), 53a-96 and 53a-183b, respectively. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly failed to instruct the jury on the theory of self-defense, on the process of weighing the credibility of a convicted felon and on one of the necessary elements of the charge of interfering with an emergency call,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. TatumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. EbronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. SingletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. GonzalezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. DamatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. TerwilligerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.