Pearsall v. Duke Power Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
The appeal presents these questions: (1) Did Duke, by paying and taking an assignment of the judgment which plaintiff had obtained against it, forfeit its right to have its claim for contribution reviewed by appeal? (2) If not, has Duke shown prejudicial error entitling it to a new trial on its claim for contribution?
In stating the questions for decision we reverse the order stated by the parties, for the second need not be answered if, as appellee asserts, the first should be answered in the affirmative. In our opinion that question requires a negative answer, if a reasonable interpretation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- White v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Tarrant Ex Rel. Tarrant v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Chambers Ex Rel. Chambers v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Grimm v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Norris v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mann v. VIRGINIA DARE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Clemmons v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Cox v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
- Green v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.