Legal Opinion
Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. Republic of Palau
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 15, 1991No. 86 Civ. 0590 (RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, Morgan Grenfell & Co., Limited, The Bank of Tokyo Limited, The Governor and Company of the Bank of Scotland and Orion Bank, Limited (collectively “Morgan Guaranty”) have moved pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) and Rule 11 of the Civil Rules of this court for costs and actual expenses, including attorneys’ fees, resulting from the removal of this action by the defendant Republic of Palau (“Palau”) from the state court. This motion raises once more in this difficult and important action issues that are significant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Joseph Bucary and Patricia Bucary v. R.L. RothrockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Republic of PalauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Morgan Guar. Trust Co. of NY v. Republic of PalauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Republic of PalauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Boland v. Bank Sepah-IranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kunica v. St. Jean Financial, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Republic of PalauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Gardner v. Allstate Indem. Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
- Bradley Industrial Park v. Commissioner of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996
- Morgan Guaranty Trust Company Of New York v. Republic Of PalauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992