Legal Opinion
Boland v. Bank Sepah-Iran
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 8, 1985No. 84 Civ. 5836 (DNE), 84 Civ. 5838 (DNE)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Defendant has moved to dismiss these consolidated diversity actions for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). The court has not addressed the motion because this case was improvidently removed from state court. In the context of considering whether to remand or dismiss this case, the court finds that United States 1 courts have subject- matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ claims. The case is hereby remanded to the state court.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2
Plaintiffs are citizens of the United States and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Underhill v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. New Wrinkle, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- John Zwack, Bela Zwack and Dora Zwack, as Co-Partners Doing Business as J. Zwack & Company v. Kraus Bros. & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Johansen v. Employee Benefit Claims, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
- Zbranek v. HofheinzDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1989
- Village Improvement Ass'n of Doylestown v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Universal Motors Group of Companies v. WilkersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Gregorian v. IzvestiaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.