Legal Opinion

United States v. American Linseed Oil Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 4, 1923No. 307PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

By an original bill filed June 30, 1920, the United States charged that appellees — defendants below — were parties to a combination in restraint of interstate trade and commerce forbidden by the Sherman Act, and asked that they be enjoined from continuing therein. The court below held the combination lawful and dismissed the bill. 275 Fed. 939.

The defendants are twelve corporations, commonly referred to as “ crushers,” with principal places of business in six different States, which manufacture, sell and distribute linseed oil, cake and meal; and Julian Armstrong, who operates at Chicago…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. American Column & Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Charles A. Ramsay Co. v. Associated Bill Posters of United States and CanadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. United States v. American Linseed Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1921

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Fashion Originators' Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. Trenton Potteries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API