Legal Opinion

Brandenburg v. Metropolitan Package Store Ass'n

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIrving H. Saypol, J.

This motion as an application to adjudge and punish the respondent John H. Young for criminal contempt (Judiciary Law, art. 19 [Contempt], §§ 750, 781; § 750, subd. 3) is granted. Involving as it does the liberty of the individual, the rule strictissimi juris controls (21 CarmodvWait, New York Practice, Contempt Proceedings, § 4, pp. 161-163; cf. Matter of Kaplan [Blumenfeld], 8 N Y 2d 214, 219, per Desmond, Ch. J.; but see United States v. Mine Workers, 330 U. S. 258, 293, quoted and applied in Mount Sinai Hosp. v. Davis, 8 A D 2d 361, 363-364, also controlling). The respondent is found…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Hughes v. Superior Court of Cal. for Contra Costa Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Howat v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Overmyer v. Eliot RealtyNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  2. 110 Manno Realty Corp. v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Borden v. TobiasNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Delano Village Companies v. OrridgeNew York Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API