Legal Opinion

Todd v. Windsor

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 19, 1968No. 43780PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

The sole question for decision is whether a surety paying the total amount of his defaulting principal’s obligation may sue his six co-sureties for a joint and several judgment for six-sevenths of the amount of the judgment obtained by the plaintiff surety against the defaulting principal but returned nulla bona. The question arises by virtue of the fact that plaintiff surety brought his suit against his co-sureties in two counts, the first seeking a joint and several judgment against his co-sureties for six-sevenths of the amount of the judgment, whilé the second count seeks…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hull v. MyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Bigby v. DouglasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Lorimer v. Julius Knack Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Appleford v. Snake River Mining, Milling & Smelting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Hall v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Toy King Distributors, Inc. v. Liberty Savings Bank, FSB (In Re Toy King Distributors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2000
  2. Mansfield v. McRearyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Floyd Davis Sales, Inc. v. CENTRAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION OF MICHIGANCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Hogan v. MaxeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Rathbone v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API