Legal Opinion

Padrino Maritime, Inc. v. Rizo

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided January 22, 2004No. 13-01-641-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Chief Justice VALDEZ.

Appellant, Padrino Maritime Inc., appeals a default judgment entered in favor of appellee, Ernesto Rizo. By three issues, appellant argues: (1) it was denied due process of law because it was given no notice of the default hearing; (2) the trial court erred in denying its motion for new trial; and (3) the trial court erred in applying Texas substantive law because appel-lee’s claims were governed by general maritime law. We affirm.

I. Facts and Procedural History

As this is a memorandum opinion and the parties are familiar with the facts, we will not…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Strackbein v. PrewittTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Dawson-Austin v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. General Chemical Corp. v. De La LastraTexas Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  2. Winn v. Holdaway (In Re Holdaway)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  3. In Re De La Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  4. 21st Century Home Mortgage v. City of El Paso, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2008
  5. In the Interest of R.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API