Padrino Maritime, Inc. v. Rizo
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Chief Justice VALDEZ.
Appellant, Padrino Maritime Inc., appeals a default judgment entered in favor of appellee, Ernesto Rizo. By three issues, appellant argues: (1) it was denied due process of law because it was given no notice of the default hearing; (2) the trial court erred in denying its motion for new trial; and (3) the trial court erred in applying Texas substantive law because appel-lee’s claims were governed by general maritime law. We affirm.
I. Facts and Procedural History
As this is a memorandum opinion and the parties are familiar with the facts, we will not…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Strackbein v. PrewittTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Dawson-Austin v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- General Chemical Corp. v. De La LastraTexas Supreme Court · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
- Winn v. Holdaway (In Re Holdaway)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- In Re De La Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
- 21st Century Home Mortgage v. City of El Paso, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2008
- In the Interest of R.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.