Legal Opinion

Dawson-Austin v. Austin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1998No. 96-0442PublishedCited by 245 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHecht, Justice

in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, GONZALEZ, SPECTOR, OWEN, and HANKINSON, Justices, joined.

The issues we address in this divorce action are whether the district court had in personam jurisdiction over the wife, and if not, whether the court nevertheless had jurisdiction to divide the marital estate. The court of appeals upheld personal jurisdiction. 920 S.W.2d 776. We disagree.

I

Since 1970, William Franklin Austin has been the president, chief executive officer, sole director, and sole stockholder of Starkey Laboratories, Inc., a Minnesota corporation in the business of manufacturing and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by245 opinions

  1. Exito Electronics Co., Ltd. v. TrejoTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Angelou v. African Overseas Union, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  3. Shapolsky v. Brewton, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  4. Avary v. Bank of America, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  5. Thu Thuy Huynh v. Thuy Duong Nguyen, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005

240 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API