Legal Opinion

In the Interest of R.R.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 25, 2006No. 05-05-00918-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice WHITTINGTON.

Ambrea Rodgers raises four issues on appeal, challenging the trial court’s default judgment terminating her parental rights. First, Rodgers claims the trial judge erred in denying her motion for new trial because she met the three Craddock requirements. See Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc., 134 Tex. 388, 393, 133 S.W.2d 124, 126 (1939). In her second issue, Rodgers complains that, to the extent civil procedure rule 245 allows for the setting of uncontested cases, rule 245 violates her right to due process under the United States Constitution. See…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Director, State Employees Workers' Compensation Division v. EvansTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Lopez v. LopezTexas Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Interest of R.R. & S.J.S.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Bruce B. McLeod, III v. Alfred Gyr, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  3. In the Interest of J.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. In Re RRTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Bruce B. McLeod, III v. Alfred Gyr, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API