Legal Opinion
Kou Lo Vang v. State of Nevada
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 23, 2003No. 00-16639PublishedCited by 164 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Kou Lo Vang appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court dismissed the petition without prejudice because it was a “mixed petition” containing both exhausted and unexhausted claims. Petitioner argues that the court erred when it concluded that claims 1, 4, 5, 6, and 7 were procedurally defaulted and that claims 8 and 18(F)(1) and (2) were unexhausted. We agree with the district court that claims 1 and 7 were procedurally defaulted and that certain disputed claims were unexhausted.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Danny BOYD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. Frank THOMPSON, Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Todd Hiivala v. Tana WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Andreas Kelly v. Larry Small, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Charles Harvey Joseph Franklin v. Dan Johnson, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by164 opinions
- Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Antonio Darnell Robinson v. John Ignacio, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Armando Castillo v. James McFadden Arizona Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Oloth Insyxiengmay v. Richard MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Cooper v. NevenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.