Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Irvine

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1969No. 11255PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT,' Chief Justice:

Plaintiff Marsh brought suit to recover for his personal injuries resulting from the collision of two automobiles: defendant Irvine’s in which plaintiff was riding; and defendant Neil’s which ran into the rear of the Irvine car just after it had entered U. S. Highway 201 from the Kennecott Mill Road near Magna. Upon a jury trial, verdicts were rendered of no cause of action as to Neil and holding Irvine liable.

Irvine, the losing defendant, appeals assigning errors in a familiar pattern: that the evidence will not support a finding that he was negligent; that it shows…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hooper v. General Motors Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Haarstrich v. Oregon Short Line R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Allen v. First Nat. Bank of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  5. Jensen v. MowerUtah Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. RothlisbergerUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. McCorvey v. Utah State Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Edwards v. DidericksenUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Cintron v. MilkovichUtah Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API