Pick v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
BERRIGAN, District Judge.
The defendant, AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. (“AMS”), has filed a motion (1) to exclude testimony by plaintiffs’ experts regarding whether Barry Pick’s penile prothesis caused him to develop autoimmune disease and/or systemic coccal disease; (2) and for summary judgment dismissing those particular claims. For the reasons that follow, the Court rules that:
1. The motion to exclude testimony by plaintiffs’ experts is PARTIALLY GRANTED and PARTIALLY DENIED;
2. Summary judgment as to whether silicone can cause autoimmune disease (general causation) is…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Geraldine McCULLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. H.B. FULLER COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Walter Mixon Allen, Jr., Mattie Gayle Allen, Barry Lane Allen v. Pennsylvania Engineering Corp., American Sterilizer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Mayeaux v. Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Soldo v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- King v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Ry. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- Siharath v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Atterbury, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.