Epic Communications, Inc. v. Richwave Technology, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, P. J. —
In this case we are again called upon to determine whether a defendant is entitled to the protection of a broad release clause contained in a settlement agreement to which the defendant is a stranger. In Rodriguez v. Oto (2013) 212 Cal.App.4th 1020, 1023 [151 Cal.Rptr.3d 667] (Rodriguez), we held that language unambiguously releasing “ ‘all persons’ ” from liability was on its face an objective manifestation of intent to extend the release to third parties, and thus entitled a stranger to summary judgment in the absence of countervailing evidence. While acknowledging…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shaw v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Amtower v. Photon Dynamics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Deschene v. Pinole Point Steel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Transportation Guarantee Co. v. JellinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Iqbal v. ZiadehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Lennar Mare Island, LLC v. Steadfast InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
- People v. PutneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Breathe So. Cal. v. Am. Lung Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Calamco v. J.R. Simplot Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.