Iqbal v. Ziadeh
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, J.
Plaintiff Muhammad Iqbal appeals from a summary judgment entered against his complaint for personal injuries. The trial court ruled the complaint was barred by a general release plaintiff had previously executed that immunized “affiliates” of the defendants in the former case, and defendant Imran Ziadeh was such an affiliate. We conclude as a matter of law defendant was not a protected “affiliate,” as that term is commonly understood. We reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 2011, plaintiff sued Yosemite Auto Sales, Inc. (Yosemite Auto), its owner Eyad Raid, and Alla…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Deerpoint Grp., Inc. v. Agrigenix, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- California Union Square L.People v. Saks & Company LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Contest Promotions v. City and County of San Francisco CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- County of Kern v. Alta Sierra Holistic etc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Deborah M Manchester v. Sivantos GMBHDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.