Legal Opinion

Iqbal v. Ziadeh

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 2017No. C075203PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NICHOLSON, J.

Plaintiff Muhammad Iqbal appeals from a summary judgment entered against his complaint for personal injuries. The trial court ruled the complaint was barred by a general release plaintiff had previously executed that immunized “affiliates” of the defendants in the former case, and defendant Imran Ziadeh was such an affiliate. We conclude as a matter of law defendant was not a protected “affiliate,” as that term is commonly understood. We reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 2011, plaintiff sued Yosemite Auto Sales, Inc. (Yosemite Auto), its owner Eyad Raid, and Alla…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Deerpoint Grp., Inc. v. Agrigenix, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  2. California Union Square L.People v. Saks & Company LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Contest Promotions v. City and County of San Francisco CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. County of Kern v. Alta Sierra Holistic etc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Deborah M Manchester v. Sivantos GMBHDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API