Legal Opinion
Owen & Co. v. Keller
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 17, 1919No. Docket No. 101PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Case-made from Wayne; Webster (Arthur), J. Replevin in justice’s court by Owen & Company against Morris Keller for the possession of certain furniture. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
This is a case-made, and the following is the agreed statement of facts:
“It is hereby agreed between the parties to this cause by their respective attorneys, that the following are the facts in above cause and the ruling of the justice court upon trial of above cause.
“The plaintiff was the owner of the articles of furniture described in the writ of replevin in the files of this cause and on November 1, 1918, delivered the goods described in said writ of replevin to one Andrew Korshemoff at his place of residence, 736 Grandy avenue, Detroit, Michigan, in pursuance of the following instrument,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Young v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Young v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Button v. TraderMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Meredith v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Cash Register Co. v. PaulMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- People's Outfitting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
- Bennett v. HainesMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- In re Robinson Mach. Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1920
- Grand Rapids Trust Co. v. American Wood Working Machinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.