Legal Opinion

People's Outfitting Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 2, 1932No. K-78PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREEN, Judge.

Plaintiff seeks to recover $2,468.27 excise taxes paid under the provisions of section 604 of the Revenue Act of 1924 (26 USCA § 886 note) which imposed an excise tax of 5 per cent, on sales of jewelry, real or imitation, precious and imitation stones, clocks, watches, etc. Section 604 was repealed by section 1200 of the Revenue Act of 1926. Of the amount for which suit is brought, $2,129.15 represents taxes paid on credit sales, the final installment of which was neither due nor paid prior to February 26, 1926. The remaining sum of $339.12 represents taxes paid on credit sales,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bank of the United States v. DonnallySupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  2. Owen & Co. v. KellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Angus McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  2. California Employment Stabilization Commission v. Smileage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Cohan v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1961
  4. People's Outfitting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  5. Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API