Legal Opinion

Blair v. Calhoun

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1915No. 12577PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered May 23, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a teamster through collision with a street car.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Respondent obtained a verdict and judgment in the superior court for personal injuries, based upon negligence. In substance, the case made by the respondent to the court and jury was this: On September 16, 1913, between five-thirty and six o’clock in the afternoon, respondent, driving an ordinary covered delivery wagon on Tenth avenue south, in Seattle, with a small load of groceries, and with a small boy of his employer sitting beside him, attempted to cross King street, upon which appellants maintain a *156double-track street car line. To the east, the nearest cross-street was Twelfth avenue…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Richmond v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Helland v. BridenstineWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Beeman v. Puget Sound Traction Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thornton v. EnerothWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Reed v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Gustin v. SusnarWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Oriental Express Co. v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Snow Creek Logging Co. v. Discovery Bay Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API