Legal Opinion

State v. Nix

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 2014No. CC CRH090155; CA A145386; SC S060875PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

In this criminal case, defendant was found guilty of 20 counts of second-degree animal neglect. ORS 167.325 (2009). Oregon’s “anti-merger” statute, ORS 161.067, provides that, when the same conduct or criminal episode violates only one statute, but involves more than one “victim,” there are “as many separately punishable offenses as there are victims.” The issue in this case is whether defendant is guilty of 20 separately punishable offenses, which turns on the question whether animals are “victims” for the purposes of the anti-merger statute. The trial court concluded that, because only…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. CrotsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Halperin v. PittsOregon Supreme Court · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. Fessenden / DickeOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. NixOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. GensitskiyOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. HessCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API