Legal Opinion
King v. Board of Medical Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 5, 1944No. Civ. 12641PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
The plaintiff sued in mandamus to review an order of the Board of Medical Examiners revoking his license to practice the profession of “drugless practitioner.” Following a trial in the superior court a judgment was entered affirming the order of the medical board. The trial was held during the twilight period between the decisions of our Supreme Court in Laisne v. California State Board of Optometry, 19 Cal.2d 831 [123 P.2d 457], and Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners, 21 Cal.2d 790 [136 P.2d 304], and the trial court accordingly conducted the proceeding in harmony with the rules of practice…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Dare v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Bank of Italy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cooper v. State Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Black v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Furnish v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Cooper v. State Bd. of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Foster v. Georgia Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.