Legal Opinion

CENTENNIAL ROYALTY CO. v. Byrd & Foster Drilling, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 3, 1971No. 6161PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RAMSEY, Chief Justice.

This is a venue case. Byrd & Foster Drilling, Inc., as plaintiff, filed suit in Ector County against M. Ray Hart and Centennial Royalty Company, as defendants. Defendant Centennial Royalty Company filed a plea of privilege which was overruled after a non-jury trial. No pleadings were included in the record in so far as the defendant M. Ray Hart is concerned. Plaintiff relied solely on subdivision 5 of Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, Article 1995. We hold that plaintiff established venue facts under that sub division, and affirm. The parties will be designated…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simmons & Simmons Construction Co. v. W. L. Rea D.B.A. W. L. Rea Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Atkinson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. TalmadgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Toland v. KaliffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Byrd & Foster Drilling, Inc. v. Centennial Royalty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Ashleigh M. Smith v. Alderson Enterprises, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
  3. Ashleigh M. Smith v. Alderson Enterprises, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
  4. Ashleigh M. Smith v. Alderson Enterprises, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
  5. Derrick Payton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API