Legal Opinion

Byrd & Foster Drilling, Inc. v. Centennial Royalty Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 16, 1972No. 6229PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WARD, Justice.

This appeal is from the granting of a summary judgment in a contract dispute. The principal defendant below, Centennial Royalty Company, was previously unsuccessful in changing the venue of the case. Centennial Royalty Company v. Byrd & Foster Drilling, Inc., 464 S.W.2d 420 (Tex.Civ.App.—El Paso 1971, no writ). It has now been successful in its presentment of motion for summary judgment on the basis that the appellee had fully performed all of its contractual obligations to the appellant when it paid one-half of the contract costs of certain drilling operations. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Veal v. ThomasonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Board of Insurance Commissioners v. Great Southern Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Maxwell v. Cardinal Petroleum Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1971
  4. CENTENNIAL ROYALTY CO. v. Byrd & Foster Drilling, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Texas State Bank of Austin v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Middleton v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API