Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 5, 1997No. 010-96PublishedCited by 345 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MEYERS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to thirty-five years imprisonment.1 The Thirteenth Court of Appeals reversed appellant’s conviction and ordered an acquittal after finding the evidence insufficient to corroborate the accomplice witness testimony. Hernandez v. State, 907 S.W.2d 654 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1995). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the court of appeals erred in misinterpreting the quality *175and quantum of proof necessary to corroborate accomplice testimony…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Boozer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Paulus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Passmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Arcila v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by345 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Trevino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Malone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. Cantelon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  5. Longoria v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005

340 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API