Legal Opinion

ARCINIEGAS-PATINO

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided January 17, 2025No. ID 4084PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

28 I&N Dec. 883

(BIA 2025) Interim Decision #4084 Matter of John ARCINIEGAS-PATINO, et al., Respondents Decided January 17, 2025 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Where parties were properly served with electronic notice of the briefing schedule, a representative’s failure to diligently monitor the inbox, including the spam folder, of the email address of record does not excuse a party’s failure to comply with briefing deadlines. FOR THE RESPONDENTS: Carolina Gomez, Esquire, Los Angeles, California BEFORE: Board Panel: BAIRD,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. CERNABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1991
  2. O-S-GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006
  3. City of Portland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. F-B-G-M- & J-E-M-GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API