Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

F-B-G-M- & J-E-M-G

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided March 19, 2025No. ID 4093Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

29 I&N Dec. 52

(BIA 2025) Interim Decision #4093 Matter of F-B-G-M- & J-E-M-G-, Respondents Decided by Board March 19, 2025 1 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Electronic notification of a briefing schedule sent to the email address of record is sufficient notice in a case eligible for electronic filing, regardless of whether an alien’s attorney or accredited representative opens the email or accesses the document via the Executive Office for Immigration Review’s Courts and Appeals (“ECAS”) Case Portal. (2) A rebuttable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. GRIJALVABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1995
  5. O-S-GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API