Legal Opinion
City of Portland v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 12, 2020No. 18-72689PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY OF PORTLAND, No. 18-72689 Petitioner, FCC No. v. 18-111 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Respondents, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; CITY OF ARCADIA; CITY OF BELLEVUE; CITY OF BROOKHAVEN; CITY OF BURIEN; CITY OF BURLINGAME; CITY OF CHICAGO; CITY OF CULVER CITY; CITY OF DUBUQUE; CITY OF GIG HARBOR; CITY OF KIRKLAND; CITY OF LAS VEGAS; CITY OF LINCOLN; CITY OF MONTEREY; CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; CITY OF PIEDMONT; CITY OF PLANO; CITY OF SAN BRUNO; CITY OF SAN JACINTO; CITY OF SAN JOSE; CITY OF…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cdk Global LLC v. Mark BrnovichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Sean Allen v. Santa Clara Cnty Corr. PoaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Crown Castle Fiber v. City of PasadenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- S. WONGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2022
- ARCINIEGAS-PATINOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.