Legal Opinion
Canupp v. Children's Receiving Home of Sacramento
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 20, 2016No. CIV. NO. 2:14-01185 WBS EFBPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT'
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. Brief Factual and Procedural Background
Plaintiff Tina Canupp began working as the Health and Wellness Manager for defendant Children’s .Receiving Home of Sacramento (“CRH”) on October 31, 2010. In December 2013, she experienced back pain and anticipated having back surgery. To accommodate this disability, she went on leave protected by the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654, and California Family Rights Act (“CFRA”), Cal. Gov’t Code § 12945.2. CRH calculated that…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lawson v. PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2022
- Ravel v. Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Gomez v. J. Jacobo Farm Labor Contractor, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
- Wallen Lawson v. Ppg Arch. Finishes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Budwig v. Allegiant Air, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.