Legal Opinion
(PS) Mackintosh v. Lyft, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 1, 2019No. 2:19-cv-01849Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ADAM JOHN MACKINTOSH, No. 2:19-cv-1849-MCE-KJN PS 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS, MOTIONS TO v. STRIKE, MOTION TO REMAND, AND 12 MOTION FOR SANCTIONS; ORDER LYFT, INC., et al., 13 (ECF Nos. 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, Defendants. 23, 34, and 50) 14 15 Plaintiff Adam John Mackintosh, who proceeds without counsel, asserts he invented a 16 healthcare–rideshare program that was misappropriated. Plaintiff filed an action in California 17 Superior Court against…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.