Duhl v. Duhl
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating her right to periodic alimony payments as provided by General Statutes § 46b-86 (b). The plaintiff concedes that the trial court’s finding that the plaintiff was “living with another person” was not clearly erroneous, but alleges that there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate a change in her financial circumstances warranting the termination of alimony.
*93The parties were married for eleven years before their marriage was dissolved on December 4,1974. As part of the dissolution, the defendant was ordered to pay the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Connolly v. ConnollySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
3Cited by5 opinions
- D'Ascanio v. D'AscanioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Warwick v. WarwickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Duhl v. DuhlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Fahy v. Fahy, No. Fa-79-0232909s (Apr. 27, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Murphy v. MurphyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018