Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Kaplan

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 21, 1981PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpeziale, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from: (1) the judgment of the trial court, Edelberg, J., denying the plaintiff’s motion for modification of periodic alimony, and (2) the order of the trial court, Santaniello, J., awarding the defendant counsel fees as an allowance to defend this appeal. The principal issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion in not ordering a modification of alimony under the authority of § 46b-86 (b) of the General Statutes, the so-called “cohabitation” statute; however, because we have decided to remand this case to the trial court for an articula tion of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Koizim v. KoizimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Jacobsen v. JacobsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Hardisty v. HardistySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Scherr v. ScherrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Viglione v. ViglioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Connolly v. ConnollySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Lupien v. LupienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API