Legal Opinion

Bongialatte v. H. Wales Lines Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 7, 1922PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the award because the Commissioner did not allow him to recover his expenditure of $200 for reasonable and proper medical care, which was made by him before April 27th, 1921, and before his employer had notice or knowledge of his injury. The reasonable construction of § 5347 of the General Statutes, limits the penalty upon an employee for failure to give immediate notice of an injury to his employer, to such a reduction of the award of compensation as the Commissioner finds that the prejudice, if any, to the employer arising from such failure entitles him to. It…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartz v. Hartford Faience Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Saddlemire v. American Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cashman v. McTernan School, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  2. Finoia v. Winchester Repeating Arms Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  3. Thompson v. TowleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Frost v. Idaho Gold Dredging Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Niedzwicki v. Pequonnock FoundrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API