Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Towle

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 4, 1923PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

On May 26th, 1922, the Compensation Commissioner for the fifth district, in proceedings for compensation duly brought before him, awarded and adjudged that the defendant pay the plaintiff compensation at the rate of $11 per week for thirteen weeks.

It appeared on the hearing that the plaintiff did not give his employer an opportunity by notice to provide medical, surgical and hospital services for him, but that he provided them himself to the extent of $100 for medical services, and $36.38 for hospital care and treatment. The Commissioner ruled, as all the Commissioners were then ruling, that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Fair v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. Hall v. PaineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
  4. Bongialatte v. H. Wales Lines Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1922

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  2. Fairchild v. United Service CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Hayden v. R. Wallace & Sons Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Bassett v. Stratford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  5. Ideal Financing Association v. LabonteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API