Legal Opinion

Cave v. Wetzel

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1996No. Civil 950364PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

Sheri Wetzel appealed from a disorderly-conduct restraining order, issued under section 12.1-31.2-01, NDCC, which prevents Wetzel from having contact with Michele Cave. Because there is sufficient evidence to support the order, we affirm.

On October 9, 1995, Cave filed a petition seeking a restraining order against Wetzel. The trial court issued an ex parte temporary restraining order and scheduled a hearing on the petition for October 20, 1995. After a hearing, the trial court determined there were reasonable grounds to believe that Wet-zel engaged in disorderly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ludwig v. BurchillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Svedberg v. StamnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. MonsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Williams v. SpilovoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wetzel v. SchlenvogtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Cusey v. NagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Wishnatsky v. HueyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Skadberg v. SkadbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Tibor v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API