Cave v. Wetzel
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
Sheri Wetzel appealed from a disorderly-conduct restraining order, issued under section 12.1-31.2-01, NDCC, which prevents Wetzel from having contact with Michele Cave. Because there is sufficient evidence to support the order, we affirm.
On October 9, 1995, Cave filed a petition seeking a restraining order against Wetzel. The trial court issued an ex parte temporary restraining order and scheduled a hearing on the petition for October 20, 1995. After a hearing, the trial court determined there were reasonable grounds to believe that Wet-zel engaged in disorderly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ludwig v. BurchillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Svedberg v. StamnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MonsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Williams v. SpilovoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wetzel v. SchlenvogtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Cusey v. NagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Wishnatsky v. HueyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Skadberg v. SkadbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Tibor v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.