Legal Opinion

Wishnatsky v. Huey

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1997No. Civil 960222PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Martin Wishnatsky appealed from a judgment summarily dismissing his petition for a disorderly conduct restraining order against David W. Huey. We hold, as a matter of law, Wishnatsky did not raise reasonable grounds for a restraining order against Huey under Chapter 12.1-31.2, N.D.C.C., and we affirm the summary judgment dismissing his petition.

[¶ 2] Wishnatsky’s petition for a restraining order against Huey was based upon two separate incidents. The first occurred on the morning of January 10, 1996 while Huey, an assistant attorney general, was conferring…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Livingood v. MeeceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Svedberg v. StamnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Sandbeck v. RockwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Richmond v. NodlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Wishnatsky v. BergquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wetzel v. SchlenvogtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Towne v. DiniusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cusey v. NagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Murphy v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Skadberg v. SkadbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API