Legal Opinion

Hazell v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 10, 2010No. 06C22473; A137397PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

This appeal, from the denial of plaintiffs’ and inter-venors’ motions for summary judgment and allowance of defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment, centers on the validity and operation of Ballot Measure 47 (2006), now codified as a note at ORS chapter 259, which, among other things, contains various provisions limiting or prohibiting political campaign contributions and expenditures. We conclude that the trial court correctly rejected each of plaintiffs’ and intervenors’ challenges. Accordingly, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Measure 47 and its companion measure, Ballot Measure 46 (2006),…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. BrewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hazell v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Capitol Specialty Insurance v. Chan & Lui, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Homebuilders Ass'n of Metropolitan Portland v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Hazell v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Hazell v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API