Legal Opinion

United States v. Jack Walder Wright A/K/A Robert Morgan, John C. Heredia, and Joseph Wayne Haws

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 11, 1987No. 84-1088, 84-1133 and 84-1134PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KANE, District Judge.*

FACTS

Defendants Joseph Haws, John Heredia and Jack Walder Wright, a/k/a Robert Morgan [hereafter named Robert Morgan] raise eight allegations of error in their appeals from jury convictions on counts of conspiracy, two counts of interstate transportation of money obtained by fraud and one count of wire fraud. The focal point of the case was the activities of a corporation known as Fiscal Services, Inc. [FSI].

The most important aspect of the FSI business was an accounts payable program. Although modified from time to time, the essence of the program was to offer customers…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. PaynerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. Robert McPartlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. MartinoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Hill v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Petzoldt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  3. Linda K. Moothart v. A. Gary Bell, Bradley P. Pollock, Bell & Pollock, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Martin Cardenas, A/K/A Raul RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API