Legal Opinion
United States v. Claudy Ray Herron and Johannes Faul
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 6, 1987No. 86-1413PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
GARZA, Circuit Judge:
The petition for rehearing is GRANTED. The previous panel opinion appearing at 816 F.2d 1036 is withdrawn. The following opinion shall be substituted in its place:
Johannes Faul and Claudy Ray Herron, defendants-appellants, challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support their wire fraud convictions for fabricating and participating in a scheme designed to facilitate a large cash deposit in an American bank without triggering a Currency Transaction Report (CTR). Faul also challenges his conviction for conspiracy to defraud the United States.…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. Fred A. Shelton, United States of America v. Marvin JamesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Asher, Robert B.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Ira Henderson MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Paul Ochs, Jr., United States of America v. Richard DrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Andrew J. LoneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.