United States v. Fred A. Shelton, United States of America v. Marvin James
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Fred A. Shelton and Marvin James brought habeas corpus actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1982), asserting that their convictions under the mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (1982), are invalid in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in McNally v. United States, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 2875, 97 L.Ed.2d 292 (1987). The district court ruled that McNally should not be given retroactive effect in the context of a section 2255 proceeding, and denied relief. We heard the resulting appeals en banc, and we now hold that McNally should be applied retroactively. We also hold…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- United States v. Orrin Shaid, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Akzo, N.V.District Court, D. Maryland · 1991
- United States v. Thomas E. KeaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. David M. Saks, United States of America v. James Doyle SpruillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Gordon WalgrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.