Edward Gallagher v. Kathleen Persha

MURRAY, RJ.

In Docket No. 325471, plaintiffs, Edward Gallagher and Joan Gallagher, appeal as of right an order granting defendant Kathleen Persha’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8), on the basis that plaintiffs had failed to state a claim for fraud, and concluding that plaintiffs’ sole remaining claim of “piercing the corporate veil” was not viable without an underlying cause of action.

In Docket No. 327840, plaintiffs appeal by leave granted 1 an order denying their motion to reinstate a 2012 case against defendants, Kaper Properties, Inc., a Michigan real estate…