Oszajca v. Sears (In Re Oszajca)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
FRANCIS G. CONRAD, Bankruptcy Judge.
The issue in these consolidated actions comes before us 1 upon cross-motions for summary judgment in the Oszajca v. Sears adversary proceeding. The debtors in the other two cases have asked that their fates be determined according to our resolution of the underlying issue in the Oszajca case— whether Sears’ lending and sales procedures render it secured under Vermont’s Retail Installment Sales Act (VRISA). 2 We hold that Sears is not entitled to take a security interest under VRISA and is, accordingly, unsecured. Due to factual…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Philbrook v. GlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Manuel v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- In re A. C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commerce Bank, N.A. v. Tifton Aluminum Co. (In Re Win-Vent, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1997
- In Re OszajcaBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Second Circuit · 1997
- In Re BeckUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2000
- McLeod v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. (In Re McLeod)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000